Saturday, 16 April 2016

Will you act against the world’s sixth mass extinction? By Juliette RASCALOU

 Afficher l'image d'origine

A biological crisis is a brutal and massive disappearance of a large population of species because of too rapid a modification of the environment. During the Cretaceous period, 65 billion years ago, one such massive extinction occurred. We still don't really know why it happened: theories about its causes are very controversial, but most of the species of the Earth disappeared, among others, the T-Rex and the diplodocus. But it was only the latest of the biological crises that the Earth has undergone; there were four major crises before that one.

Since the 15th century, between 17,000 and 100,000 species have disappeared each year. The rate of species extinction is now higher than ever. Because of this, scientists think we have entered a new period of biological crisis. This is what we call the sixth biological crisis of the Earth. But, the fact is that natural events (like meteorites, volcanoes or glaciation) haven't caused this new crisis. It's happening because all the environments of the planet are undergoing human impact. It destroys ecosystems and makes species move to new places. If, in an ecosystem, there is a change, it has repercussions on the whole of the ecosystem. Furthermore, human beings use places for the exploitation of only one species (for example cows), to the detriment of specific ecosystems and species. The biodiversity we observe today is the result of 3,5 billion years of evolution and presents a wealth never known so far. It is being seriously threatened by one species: ourselves…

We live in these ecosystems, so that's why we need to preserve them and the species which live in them. But we tolerate irresponsible behaviour. One example among so many: a hunter won't hesitate to kill a lion, just for the “prestige” value.

Our behaviour is blind. We live in this world. Earth has a unique biodiversity. Do we really want it to change? Do we really want our children not to be able to see the incredible animals we still have? 

Links:

http://www.futura-sciences.com/magazines/terre/infos/dico/d/paleontologie-extinction-masse-8652/

Juliette RASCALOU will become a biologist.

The World Annual Council of Insects (2016). By Juliette DE KEYSER



President Grasshopper speaks:

“My dear friends, the situation is critical; we will very soon be massively eaten by humans. The biped invader is expected, according to the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), to reach nine billon specimens by 2050. And the most inconceivable thing is that the UN (United Nations) has selected us as the number one delicacy of human gastronomy!

We, the six legs, were already the prey of Asians for centuries, but European and North Americans are now seeing us as an alternative source of food. We are now recognized as a great source of proteins, vitamins and minerals by Time magazine, the BBC and even TED (they are planning conferences about how good we taste, once cooked).

Furthermore, those senseless humans have other means to produce food. The BBC announced that Mark Post has created lab-grown meat. Wouldn’t vegetarians feel queasy? Unfortunately, at the present time, it can’t be produced massively; it’s still being developed…

Those repellent mammals could create more nutritional supplement to deal with the food shortage that is awaiting them. Humans have already mastered molecular manipulations and even artificial flavours. So why can’t they just stick to those achievements?

How about seaweed? It would be like eating a subaquatic salad right? It’s nourishing, it can be harvested on mass and it’s already in the plates of many Europeans (they call it “sushi”). “It's the fastest growing plant on earth” says Dr Craig Rose. Isn’t that perfect? Yet humans persistent in thinking that we are the best potential source of food!

Something has remained unsaid, ladies and gentlemen: I call it the “Yuck Factor”. My dear friends, let’s show how loathsome we can be. I swear by the Great Grasshopper in the Sky, and to all of you, as long as my mandate lasts, together, we will resist and we will fight this Biped Threat!”

Links:

http://futurefood2050.com/beefing-up-test-tube-meat/

Juliette DE KEYSER wants to work as a food production scientist.

Reforms, reforms, reforms... By Anaïs LESCHER

Afficher l'image d'origine

In March 2015, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, the Education Minister, presented her project for the secondary school reforms which will come into effect in the 2016-2017 school year. The official text was released on the 20th May 2015. Many parents and teachers don't understand the government's policies, hence the several anti-government demonstrations…

One of the propositions is for all pupils to start learning a second language in 7th grade instead of 8th grade. The specialized classes in which children learnt two languages therefore will cease to exist (they are considered too “elitist” by the Government anyway). But the opposition of the teachers and parents has been successful as 70% of the bilingual sections will be maintained. This, however, will cause territorial inequalities: 100% of these classes will be maintained in Paris but in the catchment areas of Montpelier, Nice, Toulon and Clermont-Ferrand 10 to 15% of them will close, and in Rouen, Lyon and Grenoble, 75% of them will disappear. In Caen, only 3 bilingual classes (out of 60) will remain…

The European sections (in which pupils learn some of their subjects in a foreign language) will suffer the same fate as they are judged too “elitist”, though the parents and teachers consider these classes as a plus and as preparation to study abroad.

The phasing out of two-language classes and of the European sections is an obvious case of dumbing down. Why should we penalize pupils who are able to take on extra hours, and do more? The most surprising thing is that two-language classes are going to be created in the “ZEP” (priority education zones). This proves that these types of classes actually are helpful to the pupils, so why phase them out elsewhere?

This reform doesn't only have bad points. It will, for example, generalize the personalised accompaniment of pupils in secondary school and this is a plus as the pupils of this level are not always independent enough. It will also encourage working in small groups, which can only be good as classes are so overcrowded.

Sources:
France TV info
Le Monde
Décret n°2015-544 du 19 mai 2015 relatif à l'organisation des enseignements au collège
Arrêté du 19 mai 2015 relatif à l'organisation des enseignements dans les classes de collège

After her studies, Anaïs LESCHER would like to become a teacher.

Friday, 15 April 2016

The end of the one-child policy in China. By Salomé NICLOT


This morning, while I was reading my usual newspaper, I made a surprising discovery: the one-child policy was finally removed last October in China. In “Courrier International”, a French weekly newspaper, whose objective is to translate and give you access to articles written by newspapers from around the world, I found a special investigation dedicated to this subject. One article, translated from the daily Chinese newspaper called Gongren Ribao, especially caught my attention, highlighting the “children above the allowed quota of 1 child per family” condemned to live without a legal identity, usually called “the people of the shadows”. According the 6th national census of 2010, there are more than 13 million people not on the births, deaths and marriages register. This represents 1% of Chinese. 7,8 million of them are supernumerary children. Li Xue, a young woman of 22 is one of them. Her parents couldn’t afford to pay the 5000 yuan that are required to pay for a second child “paying 5000 yuan would have forced us to stop eating during 3 years” said her mother to the journalist. Therefore, her daughter never had any legal papers to prove her existence, no possibility to go to school, to take the train, and has no social security number. Today she has difficulties finding a job, and she will never be able to start a family. How could people still live without an identity in our modern world?

I started to ask myself what the aim of this law was. Why was it created and what was its objective? I found my answer in an article written by “le Monde” explaining that China introduced birth control at the end of the 1970s, under Deng Xiaoping, to slow down its galloping demography. It has effectively avoided 400 million births, and has probably been a key factor in the success of the Chinese economic boom. However, this policy has also created side effects on China’s demography: as the population could only have one child per family, they preferred to have a boy for cultural reasons, so many women aborted their baby girls. As a consequence, the number of men exceeds the number of women by several million. It has created a huge lack of women in China’s population. In order to reduce this problem, the government has adapted new rules, first authorizing the couples, in rural regions, to have a second child if the first one was a girl. In 2013, they implemented the following right: couples being themselves single children were to be allowed to have two children.

Next question I asked myself: if this policy was economically successful, why did China decide to end it? An article in the “Nouvel Observateur” gave me some explanations: firstly, this law gave rise to strong opposition, and secondly because of the aging population in China (mostly due to the high rate of abortions). According to other newspapers, it seems that aging in China is a real problem: one of the most famous demography specialists, Cai Yong, has even said, in “Le monde”, that “this measure arrives a decade late”.

Sources:

Article from “Courrier International” dated February 2016
http://www.leparisien.fr/societe/chine-fin-officielle-de-la-politique-de-l-enfant-unique-27-12-2015-5404281.php#xtref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.fr%2F

Salomé NICLOT wants to work in international relations.

Liberalizing farming. By Pierre CAILLET

Afficher l'image d'origine

“Poorly organized, not big enough, not productive enough…” Do French farmers have it all wrong?

Clearly, the current situation is purely their own fault, and farmers surely deserve what they have got. Considering that they are the category that is most affected by suicide, and their prospects are virtually nonexistent, they could do what their predecessors did: choose another job (the number of cattle breeders has decreased by 40% over the past decade)! But no, some still try to live off their land, and exploit their animals, even if by doing so they have to sell at a loss. But this, it would seem, is not about to stop…

But that was before the European authorities’ intervention which found THE solution. Does the TTIP ring a bell? It’s the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, a proposed trade agreement between the European Union and the United States, the aim of which is promoting trade and multilateral economic growth. This treaty is a death sentence for our cattle breeders. It means the arrival of American beef, which is fed genetically modified crops and injected with hormones, at a very attractive price for the consumer in French supermarkets. Thanks a lot, you Brussels technocrats!

Do you not rejoice to see Europe condemn its own farmers? After all, it is not the first measure taken by the UE to destroy agriculture: we can point to the liberalization of the milk and meat markets (nowadays farmers are dependent on multinational companies) or even the establishment of production quotas which strengthen the power of these big corporations over the farmers.

Because of the will to liberalize “rationally”, the State has put itself in a complicated situation in which its ability to act has become limited. The best example is the swine crisis of last January; the State was incapable of solving the problem. Farmers are in a tricky situation, stuck between authorities with limited power, bureaucratized unions (FNSEA), and an EU which only makes things worse…

Sources:

http://www.atlantico.fr/decryptage/crise-agricole-en-marre-que-chacun-prenne-responsabilites-etat-europe-mais-aussi-agriculteurs-francais-jean-marc-sylvestre-2590311.html
http://www.web-agri.fr/observatoire_marches/lait.html
http://reporterre.net/Voici-comment-la-grande-distribution-ecrase-l-agriculture-en-Francehttp://www.francetvinfo.fr/economie/emploi/metiers/agriculture/crise-des-eleveurs/crise-des-eleveurs-trois-graphiques-pour-connaitre-la-composition-du-prix-quand-on-achete-un-kilo-de-viande_1007023.htmlhttps://resistanceinventerre.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/xavier-beulin-patron-de-la-fnsea-et-nabab-de-lagrobusiness-tentaculaire/
http://www.eleveur-laitier.fr/archive/

Pierre CAILLET wants to be a farmer.

Why are lawyers being arrested in China? By Clara DELMAS

Afficher l'image d'origine

For several months now lawyers are being arrested in China. What is their crime? They defend human rights…

Despite some positive steps since Xi Jinping's coming to power in March 2013, the Communist Party has got a tight grip on political life and much of society. China’s authoritarian government has restricted self-expression of its citizens. In the most developed countries human rights are respected whereas in China they are not.

It was about this subject that many lawyers have spoken at their risk of their lives. On July 9, 2015, early in the morning, Wang Yu, a human rights lawyer, sent a worried text to her friends: as “punishment” her internet and electricity were cut off. A few hours later, she sent another message and people tried to break into her home. Around midday, her friends could no longer get in touch with her because she was no longer at home. Wang Yu’s disappearance marked the start of a nationwide crackdown on human rights lawyers by the Chinese authorities.

Amnesty International made a priority out of it. This disappearance became personal to them. They found that many of the lawyers arrested have worked on high-profile human rights cases that are deemed damaging to the Chinese government. More than 200 lawyers and associates have been detained, with at least 25 still missing or detained by police.

I think that the Chinese government’s attitude is ignominious. People are not free; they are afraid to express themselves. The behaviour of the other countries is shameful too because, even if they know what is happening they turn a blind eye and continue to trade with China.

Websites:

Amnesty: https://www.amnesty.org.uk/china-hundreds-human-rights-lawyers-targeted
Vice News: https://news.vice.com/article/china-has-arrested-a-group-of-lawyers-already-being-secretly-detained
NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/13/world/asia/china-rights-lawyers-arrest.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/07/22/world/asia/china-missing-rights-defenders.html
The Atlantic: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/01/china-lawyer-crackdown-arrest/424005/
CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/01/12/asia/china-sweden-human-rights/

Clara DELMAS would like to become a lawyer after her Law studies. Her main motivation is to promote human rights and to fight injustice.

Information soldiers. By Liz GORSEN


In today’s society, media and new technologies are commonplace. We easily have access to international information, reported in so many ways (satirical, subjective or simply informative). And for the journalist, it’s a boon to have the freedom to report everything and, sometimes, they stay anonymous with the aim of writing about taboo subjects and not risk anything.

But, surprisingly, the number of journalists’ deaths has risen. Sadly, we can consider that the real issue of this topic is that in 9 out of 10 cases of journalists being murdered, the killer isn’t punished. So, it leads to more violence because the killer considers that he lives in a world of lawlessness where killing journalists or kidnapping them can become a habit. That’s why the United Nations General Assembly has proclaimed the 2nd of November, the “International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists”. This day commemorates the assassination of two French journalists in Mali.

Also, the murders are becoming horrific. These barbarians cut their heads off or impale them, one of the favourite processes of ISIS. It’s like propaganda, showing they are determined to stop Westerners and eradicate their values. The memorable case of James Foley, a US journalist is a great example. They filmed his execution and posted it online to put pressure on the US government.

These murders are becoming more and more frequent. Killing journalists raises the terror of the population, and it’s an effective way to show terrorists’ determination to eradicate freedom of expression.

But, there are many different kinds of violence against journalists. The numbers are there: 178 journalists imprisoned, 66 killed and almost 2000 threatened or attacked in 2014. These numbers are worrying because we realize that if we can’t force a journalist to stay in a safe place if he wants to investigate on site. By “on site”, we mean the most dangerous areas like Islamic State or Eastern Libya.

But the radical Islamic organisations aren’t the only journalists’ executioners. Closer to us, in 2015, during a meeting of the French national-conservative political party National Front, the team of a satirical TV show “Le Petit Journal” was attacked by the crowd because of their assumed animosity towards the party.

Being a journalist isn’t what people think. They don’t sit at their desk and write. They are soldiers and advocates of peace.

Sources:

Liz GORSEN wants to be a journalist.